Wordplay

You know those mornings when you wake up, drag your bleary-eyed self over to the coffeemaker, pour that steaming cup of Joe (mostly) into your mug, then stagger to the laptop to see what new and fascinating developments Facebook and Twitter have dumped into your inbox overnight? Somebody’s posted a link to the latest free Kindle books, somebody else is passing around a hilarious new Lolcats, and somebody else has a question about their latest plot problem. So between swigs of coffee, you start typing responses. You’ve only just woken up. The caffeine hasn’t kicked in. But, hey, at least your fingers are moving over that keyboard. You hit send, then head off for a shower.

Not until you return to the computer forty-five minutes later, do you realize you’ve really stepped in it. The latest notification in your inbox is from your friendly neighborhood Grammar Nazi, who has taken it upon himself to inform you that your last comment was an opprobrium to the hallowed study of grammar, spelling, diction, and other such inviolables. Your great sin? You wrote “your” instead of “you’re.” Forget about even trying to claim you were under the influence of that cup of morning coffee. Forget about pointing out that it was a simple typo, a slip of your fingers when your brain really did know better. Forget about claiming it could have happened to anyone. You think the Grammar Nazis care about piddling little excuses like that? Nosirree!

Image by BuzzLOL.com

Why I Hate Grammar Nazis

I’m going to admit up front that I really don’t get why people think they have a duty (much less a right) to point out every little mistake, particularly in the relatively informal setting of social media. Good manners says overlooking the occasional and inevitable little boo-boo is the better part of courtesy.

The truth is we all make honest little mistakes. We all rip off a tweet and slap the enter button before we’ve really had proper time to proofread it. We’ve all cringed when we’ve caught the typo after it’s gone live for all the world to see. Most of the time, we don’t need Mr. Grammar Nazi to tell us where we erred. Most of the time, when he does tell us, we just want to bonk his annoying little know-it-all head with something heavy and blunt.

Why I Am One

And yet, as much as Grammar Nazis sometimes drive me up the wall, I also have to admit my affinity with them. I try my absolute bestest not to point out every misplaced comma, every misused term, and every misspelled word I see. But, I tell you what, it’s hard! When you’re watching the English language tumble down around your head, it’s tough not to run around like Chicken Little, screaming, “The grammar’s failing! The grammar’s failing!”

I love my language. I love its precision. I love its rules. I’m also more than a little OCD, so, naturally, I want to fix everyone’s mistakes. But I don’t. Not always, at any rate. Because I believe there’s a time and a place to pick your battles.

How to Correct Grammar Effectively

To be effective in sharing our knowledge with the leetspeakers, we have to realize why most people hate the guts out of Grammar Nazis and then approach with caution. Here’s a good plan of attack:

• Don’t jump on every typo you see.
• Double-check your proposed correction is indeed correct.
• Consider whether the typo was the honest mistake of someone who knew better or something committed out of ignorance.
• If the former, consider letting it go. If the latter, consider the following.
• Determine whether the person at fault wants to improve.
• If yes, contact them in private. Few people appreciate being told their faults in a public forum.
• Be kind. No one likes a know-it-all. Even when he’s right. Okay, especially when he’s right.
• If no, take a deep breath. Realize it doesn’t matter. Let it go. Move on.

If we can learn to follow these steps, we’ll not only have a better chance of encouraging correct word usage among our fellows, we might even be able to shake the annoying connotations people associate with us. Maybe we’ll even get a better name one of these days. Something like Grammar Jedi?


Tell me your opinion: Do other people ’s typos drive you nuts?


Related Posts: Keeping Your Writing a Secret


The Importance of Pleasing Ourselves in Our Writing


Should You Write for a Specific Audience?
_________________


Click the “Play” button to Listen to Audio Version (or subscribe to the Wordplay podcast in iTunes).

This week’s video offers some thoughts about the benefits of 25 cent words over $100 ones—and vice versa.





Video Transcript: The debate between the worthiness of 25 cent words versus 100 dollar words is ongoing among authors. Some of us argue that simplicity is always best, if only because we can’t risk confusing our readership with unfamiliar language. Others among us want to embrace the full scope of the English vocabulary and utilize the impressive and specific big words. This is an argument that rages all the way from the ranks of the newbies to the halls of the masters. Contemporary Pulitzer winners William Faulkner and Ernest Hemingway had an infamous exchange, in which Faulkner said Hemingway could never be accused of using “a word that might send a reader to the dictionary.” To which Hemingway shot back, “Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?”

In general, I am huge vocabulary nut. I love the big words, the unusual words, the arcane words. I love the discovery of a word that perfectly describes something which might otherwise have required half a dozen smaller words. I love it when I see that word used correctly by other authors, and I love it when I get the chance to use it myself. But restraint is always the order of the day. An author’s choice of words should always be guided by the requirements of the story. George Orwell’s commandment to “never use a long word where a short one will do” is good advice. Even better, however, is the common sense stricture to never use a word that your narrators wouldn’t use.

You don’t want your hillbilly characters talking like college graduates. I recently read a book that featured poor backwoods characters who remarkably managed to cram words such as irrefutable, cosmolined, effaced, obliterated, carborundum, progenitorless, and apotheosis—all into one paragraph. So, by all means, don’t let the big words die, but also don’t kill them through misuse.


Tell me your opinion: Do you believe unusual words should be embraced or avoided?


Related Posts: Don't Let the Big Words Die


Why You Should Steal From Other Authors


Is the Thesaurus Your Friend?

Image by ellomello135

Today, I’m honored to be hosted on The Artist's Road. Be sure to stop by the blog to read my guest post “Write Yourself a Bad Review ” Below is a sneak peek:

We all hate the critic in our heads. You know the one—talks with a nasal British accent, uses words like “deluded numbskull” and “insufferable incompetent,” and never fails to announce that your latest story is tripe. This critic of ours never seems to have a good word to say and is always running us down. So, naturally, we try to block him out as much as possible. But what if we were to actually give him permission to speak every now and then? What if his grumblings and mumblings had something of benefit to offer us?

Three’s a crowd—especially when authors have to juggle three or more characters in a single scene. One character? No problem. We can safely call him “he” throughout the entire scene without once worrying about confusing our readers. Two characters? Eh, that’s in the bag. The dialogue alternates between characters every other line, and, if they happen to be of opposite genders, we can still safely use the pronouns.

But three or—heaven forbid—more characters? How do we juggle scenes in which multiple characters are all supposed to be acting and talking? How do we keep a dozen characters involved in the scene without making it feel like a rote rotation of speakers? Most importantly, how do we keep this stampeding cast of characters from trampling our readers and leaving them bruised and confused?

Image by Martin Cepan.

Ask yourself the following questions:

What’s the point?

Figure out the point of your scene early on and keep it firmly in mind as you navigate your sea of characters. Think about that last boardroom meeting you wrote. It no doubt had a ton of characters—some of them important and some of them not—and if you had taken the time to touch base with every character, the scene would have lost focus.

What’s the conflict?

Conflict’s another important (nay, vital) ingredient that can often get lost amidst the clutter of multiple characters. We can get so involved in arranging, describing, and chatting with our horde that we forget to make sparks fly among them. A friendly chat among half a dozen characters isn’t interesting. A raging argument on the other hand...

Who will be your primary characters?

Your scene may require the presence of twenty characters, but that doesn’t mean the bulk of the scene has to involve all of them. You’ll be better able to focus your scene and ramp up the conflict if you keep the primary exchange anchored between two or three primary characters. Most of us can’t carry on a conversation with a dozen people at once anyway. We instinctively fragment into smaller groups, and so should your characters.

Are you introducing too many characters?

Bad enough when readers have to keep up with a dozen already-familiar characters. But when they’ve just been introduced to these people, their chances of figuring out who’s who go down the drain. If you know you’ve got a big (and by big I mean crowded) scene coming up, lay the groundwork by introducing all the prominent players in earlier scenes.

How are your characters unique?

You can help readers navigate the crowd by making sure none of your characters blend together. Make them memorable by giving them unique personal traits. And help readers differentiate them by making certain none of their names begin with the same letter or look too similar on the page.

Is your dialogue clearly tagged?

Perhaps the biggest potential pitfall of multiple-character scenes is the dialogue. Unlike two-speaker dialogue exchanges, in which readers understand the dialogue is ping-ponging back and forth between the two characters, conversations among multiple characters can grow confusing. Whenever there’s even the slightest chance readers may not know who’s speaking, do them a favor and clearly indicate the speaker with a dialogue tag (Mike said) or an action beat (Mike thumped his glass down on the table).

Multiple-character scenes can amp up the stakes, the tension, and the fun. So long as you plan them out, realize the pitfalls, and prepare for potential problems, you’ll be ready to host the biggest character party on the block.


Tell me your opinion: What's the maximum number of characters you've ever featured in a scene?


Related Posts: Help Readers Keep Your Characters Straight


Don't Confuse Readers With Similar Character Names


The Dangers of Character Overload
_________________


Click the “Play” button to Listen to Audio Version (or subscribe to the Wordplay podcast in iTunes).

This week I’m pleased to present a post by Becke Martin Davis, part of the “faculty” of Romance University, which along with Wordplay was one of 2012’s Top 10 Blogs for Writers. Today, she shares wisdom from bestselling mystery grande dame Agatha Christie. 
I was honored when Katie invited me to write a guest blog, but also a little unnerved. I’m not actually published—at least not in fiction. Since I can only imagine the life of a bestselling author, what do I have to offer? “Write what you know” is the old adage, and if there’s one thing I know it’s Agatha Christie. 

Image by Olivia Wharton

I’ve been a mystery buff since age eight, and an Agatha Christie fan since my teens. I’ve read every book she’s written, including her poems, plays, and the romances she wrote as Mary Westmacott. My first thought was to write a post called “What Would Agatha Do?” That proved to be a little tricky. Since Dame Agatha died in 1976, I can only guess what she would do in certain situations. But I can share her comments about writing, since she wrote frankly about this subject in Agatha Christie: An Autobiography.

Everyone Has to Start Someplace, Even the Queen of Crime

In Agatha’s case it was a novel she called Agnes. As she recalled, “It had four sisters in it: Queenie, the eldest, golden-haired and beautiful, and then some twins, dark and handsome, finally Agnes, who was plain, shy and (of course) in poor health, lying patiently on a sofa. There must have been more story than this, but it has all gone now. All I remember is that Agnes’s true worth was recognized at last by some splendid man with a black moustache whom she had loved secretly for many years.”

On a Writer’s Self-Confidence (or Lack of It)

“I don’t think I went as far as being pleased with my stories—but then there always has to be a lapse of time after the accomplishment of a piece of creative work before you can in any way evaluate it. You start into it, inflamed by an idea, full of hope, full indeed of confidence...buoyed up with exultation. You then get into difficulties, don’t see your way out, and finally manage to accomplish more or less what you first meant to accomplish, though losing confidence all the time. Having finished it, you know that it is absolutely rotten. A couple of months later you wonder whether it may not be all right after all.”

On Becoming a Professional

“I had worked out the plot—a conventional plot, partly adapted from one of my other stories, and I knew, as one might say, where I was going, but I could not see the scene in my mind’s-eye, and the people would not come alive. I was driven desperately on by the desire, indeed the necessity, to write another book and make some money. That was the moment I changed from an amateur to a professional. I assumed the burden of a profession, which is to write even when you don’t want to...”

On Rewrites

“I finished the last half of the book, or as near as not, during my fortnight’s holiday. Of course that was not the end. I then had to rewrite a great part of it—mostly the overcomplicated middle. But in the end it was finished and I was reasonably satisfied with it. That is to say it was roughly as I had intended for it to be. It could be much better, I saw that, but I didn’t see just how I could make it better, so I had to leave it as it was...Then I got it properly typed by somebody, and having decided I could do no more to it, I sent it off to a publisher...who returned it. It was a plain refusal, with no frills on it.”

On Contracts

“Then he went on to the business aspect, pointing out what a risk a publisher took if he published a novel by a new and unknown author... Having given up hope for some years now of having anything published...the idea of having a book come out in print went straight to my head. I would have signed anything. This particular contract entailed my not receiving any royalties until after the first 2000 copies had been sold—after that a small royalty would be paid... I didn’t even notice that there was a clause binding me to offer him my next five novels, at an only slightly increased rate of royalty.”

What Would Agatha Say About Social Media and Self-Promotion?

“There are many careers where personalities and public relations matter—for instance if you are an actor, or a public figure. An author’s business is simply to write.”

The Guinness Book of World Records lists Dame Agatha Christie as the bestselling author of all time, although some sources show her tied with William Shakespeare. She has sold between 2-4 billion books in over 100 countries.

Note: All quotes were taken from Agatha Christie: An Autobiography by Agatha Christie, William Collins Sons & Co., London, 1977.

About the Author: Becke Martin Davis is multi-published in non-fiction, but not as yet in fiction. She is part of the Romance University team and moderates Barnes & Noble’s Mystery Forum. She is vice president of the Ohio Valley Chapter of RWA and is a member of Sisters in Crime. Several of her stories have finaled in RWA contests, and her mystery short-short “Deus Ex Machina” was featured at NPR, where Jonathan Railey called it “the literary equivalent of a basket of late night fried mozzarella cheese sticks.”


Tell me your opinion: If you could choose any classic author to me your mentor, who would it be?


Related Posts: Why No Writer Knows What He's Doing


Maintaining Your Enthusiasm Until the Book Is Completed


The Good News? Writing Never Gets Any Easier

Today, I’m honored to be hosted on The Write Practice. Be sure to stop by the blog to read my guest post “Han Solo, Scarlett O’Hara, and Your Characters: What Makes Them Compelling?” Below is a sneak peek:

We all know what a compelling character looks like.

Han Solo. Scarlett O’Hara. Tom Sawyer. Anne Shirley. Frodo Baggins.

Those are the characters we’ve cheered for, and those are the kinds of characters we want to put into our stories. But watching Han Solo swashbuckling on the big screen is scads easier than trying to write someone who can pull in readers with the same force of sheer charisma.

This week’s video talks about a simple technique you can use to encourage readers to keep turning your final pages deep into the wee hours of the morning.





Video Transcript: The ends of our novels are make or break territory for our readers. If we’ve convinced them to keep reading this far, we had better have something extra special in store for them come the end. If we disappoint a reader in our story’s climax, we’ve not only failed in our most important job as authors, we’ve also likely lost that reader for life. So how do we dazzle them in that last quarter of our stories?

Not surprisingly, there isn’t a hard-and-fast answer to this. Every story is different, so, of course, every climax is different. The foundation of your slam-bang finale has to be built into the story—the plot and the characters—that preceded it. But there is one trick that can make a world of difference in your presentation of that final quarter, and it’s one we find used to great effect in Brent Weeks’s fantasy The Way of Shadows. This technique had me racing through his pages so fast that I quite literally lost track of time.

The technique I’m talking about is nothing more or less than shortening the scenes and chapters in the final quarter of the story. Doing so creates a sense of speed and urgency, as the story darts back and forth between the important actions of multiple POV characters, intertwining them, and funneling them all down to their inevitable meeting at the conclusion. Shorter scenes—which in turn are made up of shorter paragraphs and shorter sentences—suck readers into the mad dash of your finale. However, as with everything in writing, you have to use this technique with finesse. Don’t force it. Just watch out for the natural scene breaks, which should come faster and faster the closer you get to the end.


Tell me your opinion: Do your scenes get shorter toward the end of the book?


Related Posts: Are All the Pieces in Place for Your Climax?


How to Use Scene Breaks to Cut the Fat


Keep Slow Scenes Moving With Tension and Foreboding

You know that moment when, in the middle of a brilliant novel, you drop the book into your lap, stare at the ceiling, and wonder why God chose to gift this novelist with effortless talent, while you’re left slogging in the trenches of writer’s block and clunky sentences? I doubt many of us haven’t encountered the feeling that the truly gifted writers pop into the world with fully formed writing genius. Fortunately, it’s just that—a feeling. There isn’t a writer on the planet who hasn’t had to learn his craft and pay his dues. The writing craft is a learning curve for all of us. Even the Margaret Atwoods and Stephen Kings had to log their time as frustrated, fearful authors who had no idea what they were doing. So how did they learn to write? How did they go from clunky to confident?

Not long ago, a reader emailed me, suggesting a post in which I describe how I learned to write. While I certainly haven’t reached a writing level anywhere close to masters such as Atwood and King, today I’d like to share with that reader—and the rest of you—some of the major catalytic moments in my writing journey.

I read widely. Writers have to be voracious bookworms. Read everything you can get your hands on, good and bad, until you gain a panoramic view of the literary scenery.

I read the classics. I’ve made it a goal to read all the classics before I die (at the rate I’m going, I figure it’ll take me forty-two more years). Some of the classics are great (Dickens is a favorite); some are torture (Faulkner’s A Fable was pretty much a “kill me now” moment). But in dedicating myself to reading the avowed greats from a tremendous range of authors, cultures, and time periods, I broadened my horizons as both an author and a person.

I read my genre. I probably don’t have to tell you this, even though someone had to tell me. If you write mysteries, read every whodunit you can get your hands on. Fantasy? Paw through all the Lord of the Rings knockoffs at your library. Learn what makes them work, what’s been done to death, and how to mimic their brilliance.

I read how-to books. This one was a major turning point for me. I’d happily written three and a half novels before even realizing there was such a thing as writing how-to books. Prior to this, I’d written entirely on the instinct gained from the osmosis of my bookworm habits. After this, I realized there was actually a process to writing stories. Suddenly, I went from winging it to working my way toward an understanding of the craft.

I listened to critters. From the start when I wrote one-page stories as a twelve-year-old, I always had someone edit my writing, and I always listened. Feedback from unbiased readers is crucial to understanding the effect our writing has upon other people. Feedback from experienced writers is crucial in learning how to improve so we can achieve that desired effect.

I took a writing course. I signed up for Writer’s Digest’s correspondence course “Fundamentals of Fiction.” By this point in my journey, I pretty much understood the fundamentals, so the course didn’t teach me oodles, so much as it granted me the confidence to go forth with what I’d already learned.

I subscribed to magazines. Roundabout the time I discovered writing how-to books, I also discovered writing magazines. I’ve been an avid subscriber to Writer’s Digest and The Writer for more than a decade. Having them drop into my mailbox every month means I’m always reading something about the craft, even when I don’t have a bookmark between the pages of a how-to book.

I joined a writing forum. Next to discovering the writing how-to book, probably the greatest epoch in my writing journey was gingerly crawling through the Internet to find suitable writing groups. I’ve been a member of several over the years (Christian Writers remains my favorite), and the daily contact with writers of every skill level has been a huge factor, not only in improving my writing, but also in gaining confidence and learning about the business end of the craft.

I figured out my process. Thanks to the combination of everything listed above, I was able to figure out and streamline the writing process that worked best for me. I listened to my gut, paid attention to what worked and what didn’t, and ruthlessly streamlined activities that were so much deadweight. Nowadays, I have a comfortable process that involves extensive outlining, researching, writing, and revising, and a daily schedule that lets me warm up and keeps me from procrastinating.

I made writing a priority. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, I made writing a priority early on and I stuck with it. Save for the too-sick-to-get-out-of-bed days and catastrophes such as flooded basements and orphaned kittens, I discipline myself to write two hours a day, five days a week, year round. And that makes all the difference.

So there you have it. This list isn’t exclusive and certainly won’t be every writer’s path to success. But this is what has worked for me. This is the path I’ve taken so far on my writing journey. Where the road turns next, of course, I have no idea. But that’s the fun of it!


Tell me your opinion: How did you learn to write?


Related Posts: What Inspired You to Become an Author - And Other Questions Answered


Why You Should Read the Type of Stories You Write


Pictorial Ideas for Constructing Your Own Writing Routine
_________________


Click the “Play” button to Listen to Audio Version (or subscribe to the Wordplay podcast in iTunes).

Today, I’m honored to be hosted on Write to Done. Be sure to stop by the blog to read my guest post “The Pros and Cons of Comparing Yourself to Other Writers.” Below is a sneak peek:

With the advent of writing communities on such networking sites as Twitter and Facebook and half a thousand forums and Nings, writers are perhaps more social and less solitary than at any time in our history. This brings its fair share of both benefits and drawbacks, since our easy access to other writers—both those who are striving to be published and those who have a dozen bestsellers under their belts—causes inevitable comparisons. Are we as good as they are? Are they as good as we are? Let’s explore what we can gain from answering these questions, as well as what pitfalls we have to avoid falling into face first.

This week’s video points out the pitfalls of characters who fall short of dynamism and reveals two ways to diagnose how you’re doing with your character.

Video Transcript: When you think of a good character what words come to mind? How about dynamic? Dynamic characters are the stuff of literary legend. But, at the other end of the spectrum, we have the static characters, and—except in instances in which the author purposefully leaves the character unyielding and unchanged over the course of the book to prove a point—these are usually the most forgettable and boring characters of the lot. Fortunately for us authors who want to avoid this pitfall, there are two surefire symptoms we can look for to diagnose whether or not our characters are falling prey to the static syndrome.

The first symptom of a static character is his lack of personal connection to the plot. If he can walk away from the conflict, at any point, without suffering significant ramifications, you can bet he doesn’t have enough at stake. The whole story revolves around your protagonist. Without him, there shouldn’t be a story. So if you find your main character isn’t embroiled deeply enough within the central conflict, you either need to up the stakes for him personally—or find a different protagonist who already has plenty at stake. In short, the protagonist’s involvement in the plot must matter to him as a person, preferably on both a physical and spiritual level.

The second symptom is the lack of change within your character over the course of a story. To be compelling, protagonists need to show a defined character arc. At the end of the story, they shouldn’t be the same person they were at the beginning. How is this story changing him? What is he learning? How is he growing? If these questions don’t have solid answers that define your plot, your character is probably static—and, as a result, far less interesting or relatable than readers would like. So keep your eyes open for these two symptoms, and stop static cling before it begins.


Tell me your opinion: Does your main character have any static tendencies?


Related Posts: Up the Stakes to Grab Readers


Change Is Key to Powerful Character Arcs


Plot vs. Character: Which Is More Important?